Charges against New York ex-Mayor Eric Adams' top aide are just the latest probe of his inner circle
Read full article: Charges against New York ex-Mayor Eric Adams' top aide are just the latest probe of his inner circleFederal bribery charges against former New York Mayor Eric Adams' onetime chief of staff are just the latest allegations against members of the ex-mayor's inner circle.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/3QKFQSSLXRBWPAU4VIABAXC4IA.jpg)
Supreme Court seems skeptical of Trump's census plan
Read full article: Supreme Court seems skeptical of Trump's census planWASHINGTON – The Supreme Court sounded skeptical Monday that President Donald Trump could categorically exclude people living in the country illegally from the population count used to allot seats among the states in the House of Representatives. The court, meeting by telephone because of the coronavirus pandemic, heard arguments in its second case in two years related to the 2020 census and immigrants. A delay of even three weeks would mean the Census Bureau would be turning in the numbers to a new president. The court could simply sit on the case in front of it to see what happens, or dismiss it as premature. Trump has a mixed record at the high court on immigration.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/5NOKP5PGW5DMZDWVAR6WMISPSE.jpg)
Attorneys argue Trump's exclusion order for count is illegal
Read full article: Attorneys argue Trump's exclusion order for count is illegalIn the first of those lawsuits to be argued, attorneys for the State of New York and civil rights groups on Thursday told a three-judge panel in New York federal court that the memorandum needed to be ruled illegal and unconstitutional. If the president can revise and alter the census count ... theres no real limit to what he can do," Ho said. Top Census Bureau officials had said it would be impossible to meet the end-of-the-year deadline, and that the bureau expected bipartisan support for the request. Three district court judges heard the New York case, as required when a lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of apportionment. They promised to issue an order as soon as possible, though the case likely will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
